Change functions IsValidIPv4/v6 to use addrinfo instead of custom logic
This commit is contained in:
@@ -14,9 +14,6 @@ Check if Block FullVerify is actually verifying fully (not missing any condition
|
||||
|
||||
A loophole in the reorg penalty system could potentially exist where someone broadcasts blocks one-at-a-time. Determine a solution to this.
|
||||
|
||||
IPv6 support for the P2P node. Come on guys, it's 2026. RFC 2460 was in 1998. It's about time.
|
||||
Like if someone is behind NAT, fine, workable. CGNAT? Lmao good luck.
|
||||
|
||||
TO TEST:
|
||||
Implement Horizen's "Reorg Penalty" system to make it harder for the young chain to be attacked by a powerful miner.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -30,4 +27,7 @@ I want to move away from the Monero emission. I want to do something a bit radic
|
||||
a constant inflation rate of 1.5% per year. It's lower than fiat (USD is ~2.8% per year), and it additionally doesn't fluctuate during crisis. It's constant.
|
||||
|
||||
Move to a GPU algo. RandomX is a good candidate, but CPU mining is not that attractive to anyone but people who actually want to support the project.
|
||||
Sadly, CPUs won't incentivize people who want to profit, which let's be fair, is the majority of miners.
|
||||
Sadly, CPUs won't incentivize people who want to profit, which let's be fair, is the majority of miners.
|
||||
|
||||
IPv6 support for the P2P node. Come on guys, it's 2026. RFC 2460 was in 1998. It's about time.
|
||||
Like if someone is behind NAT, fine, workable. CGNAT? Lmao good luck.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user